Is COVID-19 a Black Swan event?
In the matter of a few weeks, the way that people work and play has been turned on its head due to COVID-19. Governments and businesses worldwide have been scrambling to react to the latest twists and turns of this crisis. Many have been caught flat-footed and ill-prepared.
Given the nature of COVID-19, and the speed with which it has spread and the impact it is having globally, it is tempting to think about COVID-19 as a Black Swan event.
Nassim Nicholas Taleb popularized the concept of a Black Swan event in his highly acclaimed book, The Black Swan.
Taleb characterized a Black Swan event using the following three criteria
- It is an outlier; it lies outside the realm of regular expectations because nothing in the past can convincingly point to its possibility.
- It has an extreme impact
- Despite its outlier status, we work hard to develop an explanation for the event, after the fact, making it explainable and ‘predictable’ (even though it was never previously predicted)
The temptation for Government, Business and other leaders to label COVID-19 as a Black Swan event is compelling.
By labelling it a Black Swan, they do not have to confront the uncomfortable question of; why were we not prepared for this?
By labelling it a black swan, we can brush away concerns that none of our risk management reports or dashboards mentioned pandemic. When voters, regulators, investors and other key stakeholders ask the uncomfortable questions; labelling COVID-19 a black swan event provides an easy answer.
This would be fine except for one very import thing; it is not a Black Swan event.
COVID-19 is no black swan
Simply stated, COVID-19 is not an outlier. It is within the realms of our regular expectations, and there are several similar events in the past.
- Spanish flu (1918, 1957 and 1968) was estimated to have infected 500 million people and resulted in 50 million deaths.
- Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) (2002-2004), a coronavirus, resulted in approximately 8000 cases reported with 774 deaths across 29 countries.
- Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) (2012 – 2013) aka Camel Flu, another coronavirus. Approximately 1360 cases reported and 527 deaths.
- Western African Ebola virus epidemic (2013–2016). 26, 646 reported cases and 11,323 deaths.
One could also add to this list the various outbreaks, many relatively localized, of bird flu and swine flu that have occurred regularly over the last 20 plus years.
Bill Gates also hightlighted the risk of a virus-driven global pandemic in 2015 via a Ted Talk he gave in light of the Western African Ebola virus epidemic.
Additionally, a global pandemic, such as COVID-19 can hardly be called a Black Swan and outside the realm of regular expectations when;
- Governments have included Pandemic on National Risk Registers; for example, the UK Government National Risk Register 2017 included the risk of a pandemic caused by the emergence of new infectious diseases was one of the key risks.
- Governments have ‘war-gamed’ a pandemic scenario; as the UK Government did on October 2016 and as the outgoing US administration did on January 2017.
So if COVID-19 is not a Black Swan, how should we categorize it?
Prehaps rathe than a Black Swan, we should categorise COVID-19 as a Gray Rhino.
In the context of risk management, the concept of a Gray Rhino was introduced by Michele Wucker in her book; THE GRAY RHINO: How to Recognize and Act on the Obvious Dangers We Ignore.
Wucker characterized a Gray Rhino as a highly probable, high impact yet neglected threat.
Could a global pandemic, such as COVID-19 be considered a highly probable event? Would such an event be high impact? Was this is a threat that was neglected? I think the answer to each of these questions is yes.
Highly probable – as already stated, there have been several similar events as COVID-19, including SARS and MERS both of which are strains of coronavirus.
High impact – again, the effect from similar previous events and the current crisis demonstrates the high impact nature of this event.
Neglected threats – given the number of governments, particularly those in the ‘western’ world which had a global pandemic on their national risk registers or had ‘war-gamed’ this risk, and given the apparent lack of preparation done, it is clear global pandemic was a neglected threat.
While I have set out a series of steps that can be taken in response to the COVID-19 crisis here (insert link), below, I would like to set out some thoughts on how and where to include ‘Gray Rhinos’ risks within your Enterprise Risk Management framework.
Many business and risk leaders will naturally feel, in light of COVID-19, that Gray Rhinos type risks should be included in regular board and executive risk reporting packs. However, for many firms, this is probably not the right approach.
Regular Board and Executive risk reporting should focus on those risks directly related to delivering the firm’s strategy; including delivering specific objectives, maintaining the right level of capital and liquidity and protecting operational performance in their ‘normal’ operating conditions. At this moment, pandemic might be regarded as normal operating conditions however it is probably better to make use of an emerging risk report or dashboard to include highly probable, high impact risks.
Alternatively, (and my recommended approach) pandemic and other similar Gray Rhino type risks could be included in scenarios. For many firms, the use of scenarios within their Enterprise Risk Management framework is often limited to meeting regulatory obligations such as the ICAAP, ILAAP and SREP.
However, extending the use of scenarios and wargaming to ‘stress’ your business strategy, business model and operational resilience in the face of Gray Rhino risks, can add significant value to firms.
Four areas where incorporating scenarios into your Enterprise Risk Management framework adds values include;
- Establishes a shared view and clarify around the firm’s operating environment and strategy. In particular, the critical success and risk factors of the firm’s strategy, and their relative importance on the firm.
- Enable the firm to establish and maintain the right level of capital and liquidity under ‘normal’ business operating conditions, and quickly understand new levels when operating conditions change.
- Enables robust challenge and stressing of underlying assumptions made around the firms business strategy, business model and operational model.
- Finally, including scenarios within your Enterprise Risk Management framework helps create a ‘Risk-Based decision-making’ culture; a culture where risk, of all types, are key considerations within the decision-making process.
So COVID-19 is not a Black Swan event but it does add a new phase to the risk management lexion – Gray Rhino and as is often said, one should never waste a good crisis. Once we have got through COVID-19, use this experience to strength your approach to risk management, and if I can leave you with two recommendations they would be;
- Review your approach to risk management and ask do you have an enterprise approach that works, in good times and bad?
- Consider the use of scenarios as part of your enterprise risk management approach but go beyond using these just to met regulatory obligations (as important as that is) and use them to generate actionable business insights and to build a Risk-Based culture.